On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > > > Which seems to indicate it has received a fair amount of testing and is > quite > > stable. > > Hopefully it integrates into the 9.6 codebase without too much risk. > > Yes, yes, that's all very good, but we're nearing the closure of the 9.6 > development cycle and we only have one commitfest left. If someone had > lots of community brownie points because of doing lots of reviews of > other people's patches, they might push their luck by posting this patch > to the final commitfest. But if that someone didn't, then it wouldn't > be fair, and if I were the commitfest manager of that commitfest I would > boot their patch to the 9.7-First commitfest. > > The current commitfest which I'm trying to close still has 24 patches in > needs-review state and 11 patches ready-for-committer; the next one (not > closed yet) has 40 patches that will need review. That means a total of > 75 patches, and those should all be processed ahead of this one. The > effort needed to process each of those patches is not trivial, and I'm > sorry I have to say this but I don't see PostgresPro contributing enough > reviews, even though I pinged a number of people there, so putting one > more patch on the rest of the community's shoulders doesn't seem fair to > me. > I'll talk about this. > > Everybody has their favorite patch that they want in the next release, > but we only have so much manpower to review and integrate those patches. > All review help is welcome. > > -- > Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
