Hi Thomas,
On 2016/01/20 13:12, Thomas Munro wrote:
> That one conflicts with b1a9bad9e744857291c7d5516080527da8219854, so
> here is a new version.
- if (walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_WRITE] < MyWalSnd->write)
+ if (is_highest_priority_sync_standby)
[ ... ]
- if (walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH] < MyWalSnd->flush)
- {
- walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH] = MyWalSnd->flush;
- numflush = SyncRepWakeQueue(false, SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH);
[ ... ]
+ if (walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH] < MyWalSnd->write)
+ {
+ walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH] = MyWalSnd->flush;
+ numflush = SyncRepWakeQueue(false, SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH,
+ MyWalSnd->flush);
There seems to be a copy-pasto there - shouldn't that be:
+ if (walsndctl->lsn[SYNC_REP_WAIT_FLUSH] < MyWalSnd->flush)
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
