Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Some dump objects whose names are not unique on a schema level have > insufficient details in the dump TOC. For example, a column default > might have a TOC entry like this: > > 2153; 2604 39696 DEFAULT public a rolename
> I think we should amend the archive tag for these kinds of objects to > include the table name, so it might look like: > > 2153; 2604 39696 DEFAULT public test a rolename > > Comments? If we're changing anything, I wonder if it makes sense to go for adding the object identity there. Perhaps that would make the whole thing be a little more regular, rather than have to count elements depending on object type. So in this case it'd be 2153; 2604 39696 DEFAULT public.test.a rolename -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers