On February 5, 2016 2:52:20 AM GMT+03:00, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: >On 2/4/16 3:37 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2016-02-03 09:28:24 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >>> Would we still have some way of forcing the older checkpoint record >to >>> be used if somebody wants to try to do that? >> >> I think currently the best way to force an arbitrary checkpoint to be >> used is creating a "custom" backup label. Not that nice. Not sure if >we >> need something nice here, I don't really see a frequent need for >this. >> >> We could add another option to pg_resetxlog alternatively :/ > >I guess you'd have to scan through WAL files by hand to find the next >oldest checkpoint?
Just look at pg control, it contains the precious location? --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
