On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> [ num_nulls_v6.patch ] > >> I started looking through this. It seems generally okay, but I'm not >> very pleased with the function name "num_notnulls". I think it would >> be better as "num_nonnulls", as I see Oleksandr suggested already. > > Not hearing any complaints, I pushed it with that change and some other > cosmetic adjustments.
Would num_values be a better name than num_nonnulls? -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
