On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
> I'll commit the attached tomorrow if there are no other concerns voiced.
Just a nitpick regarding this block:
+ if (strchr(p, '/') != NULL)
+ p = strchr(p, '/');
+ /* delimiter changed from '/' to ':' in 9.6 */
+ else if (GET_MAJOR_VERSION(cluster->major_version) >= 906)
+ p = strchr(p, ':');
+ else
+ p = NULL;
Changing it as follows would save some instructions because there is
no need to call strchr an extra time:
if (GET_MAJOR_VERSION(cluster->major_version) >= 906)
p = strchr(p, ':');
else
p = strchr(p, '/');
> In the spirit of the dev meeting discussion, I am trying to use the
> commit message template discussed. Something like:
>
> -- email subject limit -----------------------------------------
> Change delimiter used for display of NextXID
>
> NextXID has been rendered in the form of a pg_lsn even though it
> really is not. This can cause confusion, so change the format from
> %u/%u to %u:%u, per discussion on hackers.
>
> Complaint by me, patch by me and Bruce, reviewed by Michael Paquier
> and Alvaro. Applied to HEAD only.
>
> Reported-by: Joe Conway
> Author: Joe Conway, Bruce Momjian
> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Alvaro Herrera
> Tested-by: Michael Paquier
> Backpatch-through: master
> That does look pretty redundant though. Thoughts?
Removing Tested-by would be fine here I guess, testing and review are
overlapping concepts for this patch.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
