On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, but isn't it better that we remove the snapshot taken > at checkpoint time in the main branch or till where this code is > getting back-patched. Do you see any need of same after > having the logging of snapshot in bgwriter?
But this one is necessary as well to allow hot standby faster to initialize, no? Particularly in the case where a bgwriter snapshot would have been taken just before the checkpoint, there may be up to 15s until the next one. And AFAIK, this code would not get a back-patch, as stated by Andres upthread :( I would think that it is better to actually get a backpatch, but well... -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
