Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So I propose the attached patch. Any objections? Should this get
>> back-patched? It's arguably a bug, though surely a minor one, that
>> the message comes out when it does.
> I would vote against a back-patch. And I kind of agree with Jim's
> comments that we ought to consider sprinkling a few more debug
> messages into the shutdown sequence.
[ shrug... ] I won't stand in the way of someone else figuring out
what makes sense there, but I don't intend to do it; and I don't think
that the quick hacks I did over the last couple days make a reasonable
basis for a permanent patch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
