On 2016-02-11 13:37:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > And anyway, these macros are a potential issue even without stdbool.h > > style booleans. > > Absolutely; they don't work safely for testing bits that aren't in the > rightmost byte of a flag word, for instance. I'm on board with making > these fixes, I'm just unconvinced that stdbool is a good reason for it.
Oh, ok. Interactions with stdbool was what made me looking into this, that's primarily why I mentioned it. What's your thinking about back-patching, independent of that then? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
