On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-02-10 23:26:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think the part about whacking around the FDW API is a little more
>> potentially objectionable to others, so I want to hold off doing that
>> unless a few more people chime in with +1. Perhaps we could start a
>> new thread to talk about that specific idea. This is useful even
>> without that, though.
>
> FWIW, I can delete a couple hundred lines of code from citusdb thanks to
> this...
>
> A quick questions about what you committed:
>
>> @@ -527,10 +532,17 @@ extern PGDLLIMPORT Node *newNodeMacroHolder;
>> */
>> extern char *nodeToString(const void *obj);
>>
>> +struct Bitmapset; /* not to include bitmapset.h here */
>> +struct StringInfoData; /* not to include stringinfo.h here */
>> +extern void outToken(struct StringInfoData *str, const char *s);
>> +extern void outBitmapset(struct StringInfoData *str,
>> + const struct Bitmapset *bms);
>> +
>> /*
>> * nodes/{readfuncs.c,read.c}
>> */
>> extern void *stringToNode(char *str);
>> +extern struct Bitmapset *readBitmapset(void);
>
> why exactly did you expose read/writeBitmapset(), and nothing else?
> Afaics a lot of the other read routines are also pretty necessary from
> the outside?
Because that's what KaiGai submitted and I had no reason to
second-guess it. I'm happy to expose other stuff along similar lines
if somebody writes a patch for it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
