On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 14 February 2016 at 08:05, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The concept of a >> lock group is formally separate from the concept of a parallel group >> created by a ParallelContext, but it is not clear that there will ever >> be any other context in which a lock group will be a good idea. > > Just coming back to this in terms of what Stephen and I raised: Robert, do > you think this design as it stands can handle cases where a normal > standalone backend gets promoted to a lock-group leader that others can then > join?
That's the exact intended purpose of it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
