Hi, Nice catch!
On February 19, 2016 2:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I think we should fix it, but not backpatch. > >I don't think that's particularly good policy. It's a clear bug, why >would we not fix it? Leaving it as-is in the back branches can have >no good effect, and what it does do is create a merge hazard for other >back-patchable bug fixes in the same area. Agreed. Unless somebody beats be to it, I'll do do so in a couple hours (11h flight now. Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
