On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > The explanations for vacuum_freeze_table_age etc. are in the section > "Statement Behavior", which is a subsection of "Client Connection > Defaults". To me vacuum_freeze_table_age etc. are totally unrelated > to "Client Connection Defaults". > > I think "Resource Consumption" section is more appropriate for their > place. There's already a section "Cost-based Vacuum Delay". Maybe we > can add a new section for below under "Resource Consumption" something > like "Managing Vacuum Freeze". > > vacuum_freeze_min_age > vacuum_freeze_table_age > vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age > vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age
Those are parameters related controlling the way the query VACUUM behaves, that's why they are placed where they are now, but so do the cost-based parameters. So +1 for a new section under Resource Consumption". -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
