On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Don't understand this. If a problem is caused by one of two things, first > you check one, then the other.
I don't quite understand how you think that patch can be decomposed into multiple, independent changes. It was one commit because every change in there is interdependent with every other one, at least as far as I can see. I don't really understand how you'd split it up, or what useful information you'd hope to gain from testing a split patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
