On 2/8/16 9:36 AM, David Steele wrote: > -#define XLogIsNeeded() (wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_ARCHIVE) > +#define XLogIsNeeded() (wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_REPLICA) > <...> > -#define XLogStandbyInfoActive() (wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_HOT_STANDBY) > +#define XLogStandbyInfoActive() (wal_level >= WAL_LEVEL_REPLICA) > > Since these are identical now shouldn't one be removed? I searched the > code and I couldn't find anything that looked dead (i.e. XLogIsNeeded() > && !XLogStandbyInfoActive()) but it still seems like having both could > cause confusion.
I think this should eventually be cleaned up, but it doesn't seem necessary in the first patch. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
