On 01/03/16 18:18, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2016-03-01 18:09:28 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 01/03/16 17:57, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Artur Zakirov wrote:
Hello, Andres
You have introduced a large replication progress tracking infrastructure
last year. And there is a problem described at the link in the quote below.
Attached patch fix this issue. Is this patch correct? I will be grateful if
it is and if it will be committed.
AFAICS this is clearly a bug introduced in 5aa235042:
/* replay actions of all transaction + subtransactions in order */
ReorderBufferCommit(ctx->reorder, xid, buf->origptr, buf->endptr,
- parsed->xact_time);
+ commit_time, origin_id, origin_lsn);
}
Well yeah but the commit_time is set few lines above as Artur pointed out, I
think the proposed fix is correct one.
I'd rather just initialize commit_time to parsed->xact_time.
This indeed is clearly a bug. I do wonder if anybody has a good idea
about how to add regression tests for this? It's rather annoying that
we have to suppress timestamps in the test_decoding tests, because
they're obviously not reproducible...
The test for commit timestamps checks that the timestamps are within
reasonable time frame (for example, bigger than value of a timestamp
column in the table since that's assigned before commit obviously) ,
it's not perfect but similar approach should catch issues like this one.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
