I wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yes, that's the problem. Instead of using details(), summary() is
>> enough actually. And it is enough to let caller know the failure when
>> just one test has been found as not passing. See attached.
> This one works for me on RHEL6. Pushed; we'll see if the older
> buildfarm members like it.
I don't normally run the TAP tests on "prairiedog", because it's
too $!*&@ slow, but trying that manually seems to work. That's
the Perl 5.8.6 that Apple shipped with OS X 10.4 ... if there's
anything older in our buildfarm, I don't know about it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
