On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> > wrote: > > Needs Review -> Needs Review > > Waiting on Author -> Refuse moving > > Ready for committer -> Ready for Committer > > Committed -> refuse moving > > Moved to next cf -> refuse moving (if it's already set like this, it > would > > probably be a bug) > > Returned with feedback -> Refuse moving > > Which basically means we only move things that are in needs review or > ready > > for committer state, and that we never actually change the status of a > patch > > in the moving. > > > > Is that a correct summary? > > Yes, thanks for the summary. It looks like this is what people would > expect based on what I read here. > > Ok, I've pushed a code that does that. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
