On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: > > > Alright. I'm attaching the latest version of this patch split in two > > parts: the first one is NULLs-related bugfix and the second is the > > "improvement" part, which applies on top of the first one. > > So is this null-related bugfix supposed to be backpatched? (I assume > it's not because it's very likely to change existing plans). > For the good, because cardinality estimations will be more accurate in these cases, so yes I would expect it to be back-patchable. -- Alex
