Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Sure. If you have an idea what the right thing to do is, please go
> ahead.
Yeah, I'll modify the patch and commit sometime later today.
> I actually don't have a clear idea what's going on here. I
> guess it's that the wait_for_stats() guarantees that the stats message
> from the index insertion has been received but the status messages
> from the "trunc" tables might not have gotten there yet.
That's what it looks like to me. I now think that the apparent
connection to parallel query is a mirage. The reason we've only
seen a few cases so far is that the flapping test is new: it
wad added in commit d42358efb16cc811, on 20 Feb. If we left it
as-is, I think we'd eventually see the same failure without forcing
parallel mode. In fact, that's pretty much what you describe below,
isn't it? The pg_sleep is sort of half-bakedly substituting for
a proper wait.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
