On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouh...@dalibo.com> wrote: > Very good suggestion. > > I think the most productive way to work on this is to start a wiki page > to summarize what's the available information, what we should store and > how to represent it. > > I'll update this thread as soon as I'll have a first draft finished.
New design discussions are a little bit late for 9.6 I am afraid :( Perhaps we should consider this patch as returned with feedback for the time being? The hook approach is not something I'd wish for if we can improve in-core facility that would help user to decide better how to tune autovacuum parameters. The VACUUM progress facility covers a different need by helping to track how long a scan is still going to take. What we want here is something that would run on top of that. Logs at least may be helpful for things like pgbadger. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
