> -----Original Message----- > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 29 January 2003 17:10 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > I would be interested to know how many windows servers > those that are > > against a windows port of PostgreSQL have or do manage, and how > > experienced they are with that platform... > > At this point I'm not for or against. But you're going to > have to do more than a weeks worth of unscientific testing to > prove your point and move from assumptions to facts.
No problem with that. Likewise however, it'd be nice if people weren't against the windows port until testing had proved it didn't work properly. Would we have the same general reactions to a revived VMS port or one for OS/2 (not counting Tom's which is an valid concern over a specific issue)? I suspect not... Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
