On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How about instead changing things so that we specifically reject >> indexes? And maybe some kind of a check that will reject anything >> that lacks a relfilnode? That seems like it would be more on point. > > I agree, I don't have strong opinion about this. > It would be good to add condition for rejecting only indexes. > Attached patches are, > - Change heap2 rmgr description > - Add condition to pg_visibility > - Fix typo in pgvisibility.sgml > (Sorry for the late notice..)
OK, committed the first and last of those. I think the other one needs some work yet; the error message doesn't seem like it is quite our usual style, and if we're going to do something here we should probably also insert a check to throw a better error when there is no relfilenode. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
