On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Here are three patches to fix new warnings in GCC 6. >> >> 0001 is apparently a typo. > > Right, looks like it. Builds and tests OK with this change (though I > didn't get any warning from GCC6.0.0 -Wall for this one). > >> 0002 was just (my?) stupid code to begin with. > > Right, it makes sense to define QL_HELP in just one translation unit > with external linkage. Builds and works fine. I got the 'defined but > not used' warning from GCC6 and it went away with this patch. > >> 0003 is more of a workaround. There could be other ways address this, too. > > This way seems fine to me (you probably want the function to continue > to exist rather than, say, becoming a macro evaluating to false on > non-WIN32, if this gets backpatched). I got this warning from GCC6 > and it went away with this patch.
Peter, are you going to commit this? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
