On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need to decide what to do about this. I disagree with Peter: I > think that regardless of stdbool, what we've got right now is sloppy > coding - bad style if nothing else. Furthermore, I think that while C > lets you use any non-zero value to represent true, our bool type is > supposed to contain only one of those two values. Therefore, I think > we should commit the full patch, back-patch it as far as somebody has > the energy for, and move on. But regardless, this patch can't keep > sitting in the CommitFest - we either have to take it or reject it, > and soon.
+1, I would suggest to move ahead, !! is not really Postgres-like anyway. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
