On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > So, from what I understand here, we should not put total count of index > pages into st_progress_param; rather, have the client (reading > pg_stat_progress_vacuum) derive it using pg_indexes_size() (?), as and > when necessary. However, only server is able to tell the current position > within an index vacuuming round (or how many pages into a given index > vacuuming round), so report that using some not-yet-existent mechanism.
Isn't that mechanism what you are trying to create in 0003? But otherwise, yes, you've accurate summarized what I think we should do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
