On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:19:16AM +0100, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Our XTM is the yet another example of infrastructure we need to work on > clustering. Should we wait other smart guy starts thinking on distributed > transactions ? We described in https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/DTM our API, > which is just a wrapper on existed functions, but it will allow us and > fortunately others to play with their ideas. We did several prototypes, > including FDW, to demonstrate viability of API, and plan to continue our work > on built-in high availability, multi-master. Of course, there will be a lot > to > learn, but it will be much easier if XTM will exists not as separate patch, > which is really small.
I think everyone agrees we want a global transaction manager of some type. I think choosing the one we want is the problem as there are several possible directions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
