Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> It looks like a decision needs to be made here whether to apply this patch,
>> send it back to the author, or reject it so I'm marking it "Ready for
>> Committer".
>>
>> Robert, since you were participating in this conversation can you have a
>> look?
> Who, me? *looks around*
>
> OK, I had a look. I don't think this is a bug.
I agree, and Craig's complaint that this change reduces flexibility
for plugins seems to tilt the balance against it. I see that Alex
himself accepted that argument in his last message in the thread
(<cacaco5sm-ty-9yijulbxmclmskytctavqh_1j4tadfjc+1-...@mail.gmail.com>).
So let's mark it rejected and move on.
> unexpected PQresultStatus: 8
It is a bit annoying that psql doesn't print "COPY_BOTH" here.
But fixing that is not this patch, either.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
