On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I afraid so you try to look on your use case as global/generic issue. The > PL/SQL, ADA. PL/pgSQL are verbose languages, and too shortcuts does the > languages dirty. In this point we have different opinion. > > I proposed some enhanced PLpgSQL API with a possibility to create a > extension that can enforce your requested behave. The implementation can not > be hard, and it can coverage some special/individual requests well.
I'm not at all interested to discuss any of the proposed changes that have already been proposed, because we have already had lengthy discussions on them, and I doubt neither you nor me have nothing to add. What we need is more input on proposed changes from other companies who are also heavy users of PL/pgSQL. Only then can we move forward. It's like Robert is saying, there is a risk for bikeshedding here, we must widen our perspectives and get better understanding for how other heavy users are using PL/pgSQL. Pavel, do you know of any such companies? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
