Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm not really sold on enforcing that people create meaningless user
>> mappings. For one thing, they're likely to be sloppy about it, which
>> could lead to latent security problems if the FDW later acquires a
>> concept that user mappings mean something.
> I think we should just fix build_simple_rel() so that it doesn't fail
> if there is no user mapping. It can just set rel->umid to InvalidOid
> in that case, and if necessary we can adjust the code elsewhere to
> tolerate that. This wasn't an intentional behavior change, and I
> think we should just put things back to the way they were.
So, allow rel->umid to be InvalidOid if there's no user mapping, and
when dealing with a join, allow combining when both sides have InvalidOid?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
