On 21 March 2016 at 19:55, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Alexander Korotkov > <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> > I'd like to validate that this development plan doesn't overlaps with > >> > your > >> > plans. If out plans are not overlapping then let's accept this plan > of > >> > work > >> > for 9.7. > >> > >> It looks OK to me. Thanks for sharing it. > > > > > > Great! Let's work together. > > So, the last patch on this thread was posted on February 17th, and the > CF entry was marked Waiting on Author on March 2nd. Even if we had a > new patch in hand at this point, I don't think there's any real chance > of being able to get this done for 9.6; there are too many things left > to do here in terms of figuring out syntax and scope, and of course > performance testing. Moreover, when this goes in, it's going to open > up lots of opportunities for follow-up optimizations that we surely do > not have time to follow up on for 9.6. And, as it is, the patch > hasn't been updated in over a month and is clearly not in final form > as it exists today. > > Therefore, I have marked this Returned with Feedback. I look forward > to returning to this topic for 9.7, and I'm willing to step up to the > plate and review this more aggressively at that time, with an eye > toward committing it when we've got it in good shape. But I don't > think there's any way to proceed with it for 9.6. > Good decision. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
