On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> And then Alexander posted this version, without any discussion that >> evidenced that those old objections were overridden. What happened >> here? Did somebody discuss this in unarchived meetings? If so, it >> would be good to know about that in this thread. > > After that Tom Lane committed very huge patch about rework AM API. One of > aims of this patch was support for CREATE ACCESS METHOD command. > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=65c5fcd353a859da9e61bfb2b92a99f12937de3b > I've initially positioned this patch as refactoring for support CREATE > ACCESS METHOD command. > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/capphfdtlisxmxk2b4tw+4+no_1-t0rao5foyszho6+sn2om...@mail.gmail.com > During discussing Tom mentioned future CREATE ACCESS METHOD command. > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16164.1439222...@sss.pgh.pa.us > I don't think Tom would put so much efforts in this direction if he would > remain opposed to this command.
Yeah, I rather thought we had consensus on that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
