Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: >> I can produce a back-patchable variant of this if you and Peter E. >> think this approach is okay.
> Where are we on this? I'm generally okay with the approach used in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAM3SWZS0iV1HQ2fqNxvmTZm4+hPLAfH=7LeC4znmFX8az=a...@mail.gmail.com though I have not reviewed that patch in detail. One minor thought is that maybe it'd be better to do this: errno = 0; + ERR_clear_error(); in the other order, so as not to assume that ERR_clear_error doesn't set errno. On the other hand, if it does, things are probably hopelessly broken anyway; so I'm not sure there is any case where this helps. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
