Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Not sure if Andres is working on that for now or not, the main
> discussion that I am foreseeing here is how we are going to map elevel
> for the frontend (should FATAL, PANIC exit immediately, etc).
Doesn't seem that complicated to me: elevel >= ERROR results in exit(1),
otherwise just print to stderr and return. We'd be eyeballing each case
that we remove "#ifndef FRONTEND" from anyway; if it's expecting behavior
noticeably more complicated than that, we could leave it as-is.
> Stability of 9.6 is first and just ahead.
Agreed, this is code cleanup not a high priority.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
