On 25.03.2016 21:42, Dmitry Ivanov wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I desperately needed some time to finish a bunch of
dangling tasks.
I've added some new comments and clarified the ones that were obscure.
Moreover, I felt an urge to recheck most parts of the code since apparently
nobody (besides myself) has gone so far yet.
On 25.03.16 18:42 MSK, David Steele wrote:
Time is short and it's not encouraging that you say there is "still much
work to be done".
Indeed, I was inaccurate. I am more than interested in the positive outcome.
Hi,
Thank you for your work!
I tested the patch and take a look on it. All regression tests passed.
The code looks good and the patch introduce a great functionality.
I think the patch can be marked as "Ready for Commiter". But I do not
feel the force to do that myself.
Also I agree with you about tsvector_setweight(). There is not a problem
with it because this weights are immutable and so there is not benefits
from new function.
--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
