Fabien COELHO wrote: > > >- that it does work:-) I'm not sure what happens by the script selection > > process, it should be checked carefully because it was not designed > > with allowing a zero weight, and it may depend on its/their positions. > > It may already work, but it really needs checking. > > Hmmm, it seems ok.
It's not -- if you used -i, it died saying weight is zero. > >- I would suggest that a warning is shown when a weight is zero, > > something like "warning, script #%d weight is zero, will be ignored". > > includes such a warning. I didn't include this part. Pushed. In doing this, I noticed that the latency output is wrong if you use -T instead of -t; it always says the latency is zero because "duration" is zero. I suppose it should be like in the attached instead. At the same time, it says "latency average: XYZ" instead of "latency average = XYZ" as in printSimpleStats, which doesn't look terribly important. But the line appears in the SGML docs. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
