On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes: > > Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >> may be <=>? it isn't used anywhere yet. > >> > >> select 'fat'::tsquery <=> 'cat'; > >> select 'fat <=> cat'::tsquery; > >> select 'fat <3> cat'::tsqyery; -- for non-default distance. > > > Dunno. That looks pretty "relationalish". > > The existing precedent in the geometric types is to use <-> > as an operator denoting distance. Perhaps <-> amd <3> > would work here. > > looks like we get consensus about arrows.
> regards, tom lane >
