On 22/03/2016 07:58, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > On 21/03/2016 20:38, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> On 21/03/2016 05:18, James Sewell wrote: >>> OK cool, thanks. >>> >>> Can we remove the minimum size limit when the per table degree setting >>> is applied? >>> >>> This would help for tables with 2 - 1000 pages combined with a high CPU >>> cost aggregate. >>> >> >> Attached v4 implements that. It also makes sure that the chosen >> parallel_degree won't be more than the relation's estimated number of pages. >> > > And I just realize that it'd prevent from forcing parallelism on > partitionned table, v5 attached removes the check on the estimated > number of pages. > >
The feature freeze is now very close. If this GUC is still wanted, should I add this patch to the next commitfest? -- Julien Rouhaud http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
