On 4/5/16 1:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Btw, those seem like small things to me, and my comments have been > addressed, so I have switched the patch as ready for committer. I > guess that Stephen would be the one to look at it.
I have also run this patch through my tests and didn't find any problems. I agree that it is ready for committer. I don't see a problem with using the top memory context but whoever commits it may feel differently. I'm happy to leave that decision up to them. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
