On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: >> I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will >> not get fixed for 9.6. > > It may make sense to add that to the list of open items for 9.6 > instead. That's not a feature.
So I have moved this patch to the next CF for now, and will work on fixing it rather soonishly as an effort to stabilize 9.6 as well as back-branches. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
