Thank you, pushed with Petr's notice
Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 03:29, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net
<mailto:and...@dunslane.net>> wrote:
Yeah, keeping it but rejecting update of an existing key is my preference
too.
cheers
andrew
Yes, it sounds quite reasonable. Here is a new version of patch (it will throw
an error for an existing key). Is it better now?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
