> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: 03 February 2003 14:39
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Neil Conway; PostgreSQL Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interactive Documentation - how do you 
> want it towork? 
> 
> 
> "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Perhaps we should then prune the garbage out of the old 
> version, and 
> > make the comments version specific so that we start afresh with the 
> > new docs, but leave the useful comments against the older versions?
> 
> It seems clear to me that the comments *should* be version 
> specific, if that's at all feasible.  When we make a new 
> release then we can start with zero comments if that seems 
> appropriate --- but as long as an older set of docs remains 
> on-line, it should have the comments that were made for it.

Yes, from the various discussions here and elsewhere I think this is
going to be the way to go. I will make the appropriate change now.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to