On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net>
> wrote:
>
>> * Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:09 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> It seems like this patch should be set "ready for committer".  Can one of
>>>> the reviewers do that if appropriate?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll pick it up to do that as well as committing it.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, good news!
>>
>> I hope it's not coming too late, but I have a final update removing a
>> rather pointless palloc() return value check. No changes otherwise.
>
>
> Small notes:
>
> * I think it's wrong to have the docs say "leave this at the default to
> maintain compatibility" in the reference section - if anything, that's for
> release notes. And it's the default behaviour. So I just removed that one
>
> * Made some other wordsmithing on the SGML.
>
> * This looks strange to me:
> if (!res || p == NULL)
>
> it's correct logically, the style just looks weird. But maybe it's a good
> idea to keep it to make it clear that res is a bool and p is a pointer. I'm
> on the fence.
>
> * it also needed a pgindent, in particular a couple of return STATUS_ERROR
> were indented in a way that made them look like they were almost in the
> wrong place, and some minor style changes. But that's all mechanical.
>
> Other than those minor things it looks good to me, so I'm going to push
> the current version with those once I'm back on reliable wifi.
>
>

And now committed. Thanks!

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Reply via email to