On 04/08/2016 02:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
missing some lock cleanup.
With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
not even get replayed.
Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to the
replication lag [1] ?
CommitFest entry [2]
Original commit [3]
Cc'ed RMT.
If there is something you think needs to be fixed that is a new issue
in 9.6, then yes you should. I don't quite understand what thing is
from reading this, so please make sure to describe it clearly.
Michael, you seem to have the necessary permission for this. Could you
add an entry ?
Best regards,
Jesper
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
