On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Well, me to. But my feeling is the patch received entirely insufficient > amount of thorough code review, considering how important part of the code > it touches. I agree docs are an important part of a patch, but polishing > user-level docs would hardly move the patch closer to being committable > (especially when there's ~50kB of READMEs).
I have to admit that I was really hoping Tom would follow through on his statement that he would look into this one, or that Dean Rasheed would get involved. I am sure I could do a good review of this patch given enough time, but I am also sure that it would take an amount of time that is at least one if not two orders of magnitude more than I put into any patch this CommitFest. I understand statistics at some basic level, but I am not an expert on them the way some people here are. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
