On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > I find this added test duration reasonable. If someone identifies a way to > realize similar coverage with lower duration, I'd value that contribution. -1 > for meeting some runtime target at the expense of coverage. Older modules > have rather little test coverage, so they're poor as benchmarks.
+1. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
