On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-09 22:38:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > There are results with 5364b357 reverted. > > What exactly is this test? I think assuming it is a read-only -M prepared pgbench run where data fits in shared buffers. However if you can share exact details, then I can try the similar test. > Crazy that this has such a negative impact. Amit, can you reproduce > that? I will try it. > Alexander, I guess for r/w workload 5364b357 is a benefit on that > machine as well? > I also think so. Alexander, if try read-write workload with unlogged tables, then we should see an improvement. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
