Rod Taylor allegedly said: >> I modified the test program slightly to improve the consistency >> checks. The updated version is attached. > > For curiosity sake, I've compiled it and am running it on FreeBSD with > soft-updates enabled. > > A few variable declarations needed to be bumped up to the top of their > respective function.
I've been doing a fair bit of C++ recently... > Any change of tossing in a periodic VACUUM or would that throw off the > results? Dunno, Tom could best answer that, but a *complete guess* based on piecing together tidbits of how it all works from various threads here, would be that it would merely increase the time period during which a powerfail would be unlikely to cause duplicate rows. Reasoning for this is that vacuum would be messing with tuples that are already dead. Please correct me if I'm wrong :-) Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
