* From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> writes: > > * Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hm, my grep found another one ... > > > Oh, sorry. I saw that one, but thought it was intentional because _WIN64 > > is defined automatically anyway. > > Oh? Then we should not need that one (the /D switch in win32.mak) at all. > Should we just remove it? We have both confirmed several times that nothing depends on it. I think it can go. -- Christian -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
