On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Alexander Korotkov
>> So, for read-only benchmark this patch introduces more than 5 times >> regression on big machine. > > I did not schedule a saturation test on a big machine. I guess I > should have done. I have booked two large NUMA machines for Friday to look for any remaining performance regressions on high-concurrency loads on such machines. Anyone with ideas on particular tests that they feel should be included, please let me know before then. Thanks! -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
